The core responsibility of an investor relations (IR) department is to help the market understand an asset, its strategy, and its potential value. It acts as a bridge between the project and the market. When I first entered the crypto industry, what people considered "good IR" was just so-so. While we have made progress in some areas over the years, we are still far from reaching the proper level in our communication with investors. Good IR can broaden your buyer base and improve the quality of your holder structure. Poor IR, or even no IR at all, will only lead to a continuous decline in token value, no matter how excellent the product. Over the past year, we have communicated with almost all the leading projects in the crypto space to build investor relations systems, and we currently provide services to more than 20 projects. This article is a practical guide to investor communication that can be directly implemented. Distribution is key. If you want to maximize your token's value, you only need to look at two factors: how many target investors know your token exists, and how many of those investors become buyers. An excellent IR strategy must optimize both of these aspects simultaneously. There are essentially only two types of potential buyers for a token: the first is crypto liquidity funds. These are actively managed institutions that already hold your token or are continuously tracking it. For them, the core is value reassessment—seeing an institution that values your token at $1 see a path to $5. This requires precise data, a clear narrative, and consistent proof of progress. This is about narrative building and data presentation. The second type is large strategic investors or institutions. Examples include recent collaborations like Morpho with Apollo and BlackRock with Uniswap. This operates on a completely different logic: longer sales cycles, more rigorous due diligence, and you need a mature product. If you're in an early stage or need funding in the short term, frankly, these institutions aren't for you. But if you're ready, you should be where they are: Bloomberg Terminal, institutional summits, and building networks offline. Use a B2B sales mindset, not a marketing mindset. Control your narrative. If you don't actively tell your story, the market will tell it for you. The reality is, most protocols' data won't be perfect, and that's okay. What's really problematic is trying to hide things and remaining silent for months. The excuse I hear most often is, "I don't want to get flamed on Twitter." A project won't die from being ridiculed on Twitter, but it will die from being forgotten by investors. The longer you don't communicate with the market, the angrier and more disappointed investors will become.You don't need perfect data; you need honesty, background information, and a coherent explanation of what's important, what's being improved, and what still needs improvement. This is key to building trust; silence will only destroy it. Token unlocking. Token issuers must respect supply and demand. If you want to understand price movements, you only need to understand this core factor. Often, price management is more like a tactical operation to match supply and demand than anything else. The biggest mistake I've seen is teams not starting to think about solutions until 1-2 months before unlocking. In just 30 days, you simply don't have time to fix a huge supply-demand imbalance. Start planning at least 30 weeks in advance, ideally 40-50 weeks. You need time to connect with buyers, find buyers to meet demand, and communicate with investors if you need to postpone unlocking. This is the seemingly trivial but crucial part of IR; give yourself enough time to handle it. Data is your best ally. Narrative is important, but in 2026, a narrative without data is meaningless. The best IR systems use data to make tokens easier to understand, compare, and evaluate. The data itself should tell a complete story. Data can come from multiple sources: proprietary data from the protocol itself, on-chain market structure data, comparative data with competitors, and real-world benchmarks that allow traditional investors to understand crypto behavior. This last category is currently severely undervalued. Truly excellent investor communication goes beyond simply showcasing internal dashboards; it helps investors understand the role your protocol plays in the larger context. For example, you operate a perpetual contract DEX, and the dashboard shows $75 million in trading volume last month. Is that good? Is it bad? Who should it be compared to? Should investors buy or sell? I see a lot of data in the crypto industry right now, but almost no contextual information. Excellent teams don't just report numbers; they tell stories with numbers. IR is not just a compliance task. Most people think investor relations in the crypto industry are the same as in the stock market. The only problem is: IR in the stock market is incredibly boring. Vlad envisions a future where financial reports are no longer dry speeches by CFOs to 60 sell-side analysts on Zoom, but rather like post-NBA interviews—lively, interactive, and emotional. I completely agree. We have eight years of experience in goal-oriented, data-driven marketing that combines offline and social media. IR should operate in the same way. The goal is not just to "inform the market," but to attract existing investors, deepen their confidence, and expand the pool of potential future token holders. What will the future look like?Live earnings broadcasts, CEO-in-charge interactions with industry guests, and invitations for prominent holders to share their insights… these initiatives truly engage with investors and acquire new holders, lowering the entry cost for potential investors. Currently, all liquidity funds must justify their holdings to limited partners (LPs). This means due diligence and investment reports. If your protocol lacks publicly available data, research reports, and background information, you're forcing every potential investor to build their analytical framework from scratch. You're artificially raising the cost of investing in your token, resulting in fewer people willing to invest. Reduce the difficulty for them by consistently delivering high-quality information: research reports, protocol data analysis, ecosystem progress updates, and third-party analysis. Make it easy for fund analysts to write reports and include your token in their portfolios. Without data analysis, you're flying blindly. Even the top crypto protocols have a surprisingly weak understanding of investor structure. Basic behavioral analysis is almost nonexistent: How long do investors typically hold their tokens? Did they open perpetual hedging upon token launch? On-chain data makes the in-depth analysis that stock market IR teams dream of possible. If an investor claims to be a long-term believer, the truth has already been permanently recorded in on-chain data. Protocols that embed this analytical capability into their IR (Investment Relations) functions have a significant advantage: they can not only understand existing holders but also precisely target the next wave of potential investors. Transparency expands market reach. Most teams instinctively believe that less disclosure is safer, but the opposite is true. Investors already bear uncertainty for your token: unlocking, treasury spending, market-making protocols, non-standardized terms, etc. If you don't provide answers, the market won't ignore these issues; it will fill in the gaps in its own mind with the most pessimistic assumptions. The cost of insufficient transparency is immeasurable; you'll never know how many investors abandon your token due to incomplete or unverifiable information. This cost is real. Success metrics. It's easy to measure the success or failure of IR by token price. The problem is that price noise is too great, influenced by many factors beyond the control of IR: macroeconomics, liquidity, market sentiment, geopolitical conflicts, etc. A more reasonable approach is to measure whether IR improves the quality and breadth of the investor base.Here are some metrics worth tracking: growth in the number of target investors actively following the token; growth in high-quality holders across various market segments, especially liquidity funds and strategic institutions; changes in holder concentration; the number of investors who convert from initial contact to active due diligence to holding; the proportion of core holders with the target holding period; the frequency and quality of investor outreach throughout the year; growth in active investor inquiries; increased exposure in target buyer channels; and, measured through direct communication and feedback: improved investor understanding of your core logic. For liquidity funds, a very practical metric is whether more investors have developed a clear valuation framework for your token compared to a year ago. Not everyone has to buy now, but if more people understand how to view your token, know which milestones are important, and what prices are attractive, that's real progress. Successful IR isn't just about "whether the price has gone up," but about "whether we've expanded our potential holder base." The road ahead. We are building in this direction because the current state of tokens is a survival challenge for the entire industry. A regrettable fact is that most tokens currently lack investment value. Jason and I genuinely want to address this issue, and years of experience have given us a clearer picture of the future. Tokens should be more transparent and investor-friendly than stocks because they are built on crypto infrastructure. Project teams have a strong incentive to move in this direction, as it will greatly expand market reach. More importantly, the field of investor relations has been stagnant for a long time. In our view, the future of IR is not a dry, procedural task, but a vibrant, multimedia, highly interactive, and proactive approach. It requires actively engaging in offline interactions, sparking discussions on social media, and telling compelling stories to attract new investors. This is the direction the industry must take. [Foresight News]
The Critical Role of Investor Relations in Crypto Market Evolution
The crypto market is currently experiencing a fundamental paradigm shift, one that extends far beyond mere price fluctuations or technological innovations. The article “The Real Reason Tokens Aren’t Selling: 90% of Crypto Projects Neglect Investor Relations” exposes a critical deficiency that separates successful, sustainable projects from those destined for obscurity: the systematic neglect of professional investor relations (IR) practices. This isn’t merely a communication issue; it’s a market survival imperative that will increasingly determine which projects capture value and which fade into irrelevance.
Market Impact and Token Valuation Dynamics
The assertion that 90% of crypto projects neglect IR is not merely hyperbole—it’s a market distortion with profound consequences. When projects fail to articulate their value proposition, strategy, and progress effectively, they create an information vacuum that the market eagerly fills with pessimism and uncertainty. This dynamic directly impacts token valuation in several ways:
-
Information Asymmetry: Projects with robust IR strategies gain a significant valuation advantage as they reduce the cognitive load on potential investors. The cost of due diligence for investors without proper IR is artificially high, creating a natural barrier to entry that smaller projects cannot overcome.
-
Holder Quality and Stability: Effective IR doesn’t merely expand the buyer base—it improves the quality of holders. By attracting informed, committed investors rather than purely speculative traders, projects can reduce volatility and create more stable price discovery mechanisms. This is particularly crucial during market downturns when informed holders are less likely to panic sell.
-
Token Unlocking Management: The article correctly identifies token unlocking as a make-or-break factor. Projects planning unlocks 30-50 weeks in advance can strategically build demand, communicate with investors, and potentially adjust timelines—creating a stark contrast with those that face “surprise” supply shocks that decimate valuations.
Strategic IR Framework for Market Participants
Two-Tier Investor Approach
The article insightfully categorizes potential investors into two distinct groups with fundamentally different engagement requirements:
-
Crypto Liquidity Funds: These require continuous value reassessment through precise data, clear narratives, and consistent proof of progress. Their engagement is tactical and data-driven, responding to evidence of growth and momentum.
-
Strategic/Institutional Investors: These require mature products, longer sales cycles, and rigorous due diligence. Engagement must shift from marketing to B2B sales, with presence in traditional financial channels like Bloomberg Terminal and institutional summits.
Narrative Control and Transparency Imperative
Perhaps the most counterintuitive yet critical insight is that transparency—not opacity—is the superior strategy. Projects instinctively hide imperfections, fearing market criticism. However, the article correctly identifies that “a project won’t die from being ridiculed on Twitter, but it will die from being forgotten by investors.”
The market punishes silence more than imperfection. When projects don’t communicate, the market fills the void with the most pessimistic assumptions. This creates a self-fulfilling prophecy of decline that no technological innovation can overcome.
Data-Driven IR Revolution
The article’s emphasis on data represents a critical evolution in crypto IR practices. In 2026, narratives without data are meaningless. However, the sophisticated IR approach goes beyond mere data presentation—it contextualizes data to tell compelling stories:
- Internal Protocol Data: Volume, transaction counts, user growth
- Market Structure Data: On-chain behavior, holder distribution
- Competitive Benchmarking: Positioning against similar protocols
- Real-World Benchmarks: Traditional finance equivalents for context
This multi-dimensional data approach transforms raw numbers into actionable intelligence, allowing investors to understand not just what the metrics are, but what they mean relative to market expectations and competitors.
The Future of IR: From Compliance to Engagement
The article envisions a radical transformation of IR from “dry, procedural tasks” to “vibrant, multimedia, highly interactive, and proactive approaches.” This future includes:
- Live earnings broadcasts with CEO interactions
- Industry guest interviews and discussions
- Prominent holder insight sharing
- Multimedia communication strategies blending offline and social media
This evolution reflects a broader market maturation, where crypto projects adopt sophisticated engagement strategies that transcend the limitations of traditional finance while leveraging the unique advantages of blockchain technology.
Risks and Market Distortions
While the IR revolution presents significant opportunities, several risks and distortions must be acknowledged:
-
Implementation Gap: The IR expertise gap may create a new form of inequality, where well-funded projects with professional IR teams gain disproportionate advantages, potentially stifling innovation from smaller projects.
-
Narrative Manipulation: As IR becomes more sophisticated, the line between transparent communication and narrative manipulation may blur, creating new forms of market deception.
-
Institutional Homogenization: As crypto projects adopt traditional finance IR approaches, there’s a risk of losing the disruptive, community-driven ethos that initially attracted many to the space.
Investment Implications and Strategic Opportunities
For sophisticated investors, the IR revolution presents both new risks and significant opportunities:
-
Due Diligence Enhancement: A project’s approach to IR should now be a core component of investment due diligence, evaluated with the same rigor as technology, team, and tokenomics.
-
Valuation Premiums: Projects with demonstrated IR excellence should command valuation premiums, as their investor bases are more stable and growth potential is more clearly articulated.
-
IR Service Providers: The identified gap in crypto IR services creates significant opportunities for specialized firms that can bridge the divide between crypto projects and traditional finance investors.
-
Long-Term Value Creation: The article’s focus on expanding the investor base rather than short-term price manipulation represents a fundamental shift toward sustainable value creation—a trend sophisticated investors should embrace.
Conclusion
The article’s central thesis—that investor relations will increasingly determine which crypto projects capture value—represents a critical insight into market evolution. As the crypto market matures, the ability to communicate value effectively will become as important as the technology itself. Projects that embrace professional IR strategies, transparency, and data-driven communication will build more sustainable ecosystems and capture disproportionate value. For investors, evaluating a project’s IR approach is no longer optional—it’s an essential component of sophisticated due diligence in an increasingly competitive and information-rich market.