Author: Liu Zhengyao
Recently, Lawyer Liu’s consultation inbox has become bustling again. A friend sent a message saying that last year he joined a “Global Decentralized Computing Power Sharing Project,” paid 20,000 RMB as an “ecosystem node activation fee,” and then recruited three friends—each of whom also paid 20,000 RMB—after which he would receive a “referral reward.” His question was: Is this legal? After reading it, I replied: “This isn’t a cryptocurrency project—it’s almost certainly a pyramid scheme.”
In recent years, as the concept of cryptocurrency has taken root in public consciousness, a wave of project teams have donned the “Web3” cloak, repackaging traditional pyramid schemes as high-sounding concepts like “decentralized ecosystems,” “global node consensus,” and “computing power mining dividends”—leaving ordinary people unable to distinguish truth from fiction. Today, Lawyer Liu will discuss: How do you spot pyramid schemes in the cryptocurrency space? And what legal risks do you face once involved?
What is a pyramid scheme—and how does the law define it? Many people think pyramid schemes are merely “scams involving product sales.” In fact, under Chinese law, the essence of pyramid schemes is clearly defined. According to Article 2 of the Regulations on Prohibiting Pyramid Selling, a pyramid scheme refers to: any activity whereby organizers or operators recruit participants, and calculate or distribute remuneration based on the number of individuals directly or indirectly recruited—or on their sales performance—or require recruits to pay fees to obtain eligibility for participation, all with the aim of obtaining illegal profits, disrupting economic order, and undermining social stability.
Put into plain language most people can understand: If a scheme exhibits all three of the following features, it is almost certainly a pyramid scheme:
First, an “entry fee.” Joining requires payment (regardless of whether it’s called an “activation fee,” “node fee,” “mining rig deposit,” or “ecosystem access fee”).
Second, “recruiting new members.” Income primarily depends on recruiting downstream participants—not on real sales of goods or services.
Third, “multi-level compensation.” Commissions or dividends are distributed upward based on the hierarchy and number of downstream participants. Apply these three criteria to evaluate any project you’re involved in.
Why are cryptocurrency-based pyramid schemes especially hard to detect? While people may harbor some suspicion toward traditional pyramid schemes, crypto pyramid schemes pack greater “destructive power” precisely because they wrap themselves in several layers of “technical obfuscation.”
First, conceptual bombardment—designed to confuse you. Project teams throw around unfamiliar terms: DeFi, Layer 2, PoS consensus mechanisms, global nodes, smart-contract-automated dividends… Some of these terms reflect genuine blockchain technologies; others are pure fabrications—and often, real and fake concepts are deliberately mixed. Because you don’t understand them, you hesitate to question them—and are more easily swept along by an illusion of “authority.”
Second, substituting “tokens” for “cash” to blur financial flows. Traditional pyramid schemes collect RMB directly—a red flag easily recognized as illegal. Crypto pyramid schemes, however, typically require participants first to purchase USDT, then use that USDT to pay the “activation fee” or buy the project’s proprietary “platform token.” Funds take a circuitous route—superficially avoiding direct cash transfers—but the amount extracted remains identical. Even more deceptively, the project’s “white paper” often touts limited token supply and future listing on major exchanges, lulling participants into believing, “This is an investment.”
Third, the “decentralization” smokescreen. “It’s not our company controlling anything—it’s all automated via smart contracts! No one can run away!” — This, according to Lawyer Liu, is perhaps the most absurd claim he’s ever heard. In reality, the very people who wrote the smart contract are the project team. The contract can contain backdoors—or withdrawal permissions can be suspended at any time. “Decentralization” is a technical attribute—not a shield for project teams, nor a justification for legitimizing pyramid schemes.
What legal risks accompany cryptocurrency-based pyramid schemes? Regardless of its name, once an activity is classified as a pyramid scheme, participants face severe legal consequences. Organizers and leaders face criminal prosecution. Under Article 224-1 of the Criminal Law and related judicial interpretations, the threshold for conviction of “organizing or leading a pyramid scheme” is low: if you’re an organizer or leader, and the scheme involves 30 or more participants across three or more hierarchical levels, you may be convicted—and face imprisonment of up to five years—or even longer.
For ordinary participants, the absence of criminal liability doesn’t mean zero risk. First, administrative penalties: Under the Regulations on Prohibiting Pyramid Selling, participation alone may incur fines of up to 2,000 RMB. Second, losses are borne entirely by you: Property losses incurred through involvement in cryptocurrency-related pyramid schemes are generally deemed unlawful—and thus fall outside civil legal protection. Additionally, those assisting with promotion must beware of the “crime of aiding information network criminal activities” (the “Helping Information Network Crime” or “HINCA” offense). If you knowingly assist a network-based pyramid scheme—by promoting it, driving traffic, or otherwise supporting it—and your actions are serious, you could be charged under this statute.
Four Steps to Identify Cryptocurrency Pyramid Schemes:
Step 1: Examine entry requirements. Does joining require purchasing “eligibility” or paying any kind of fee?
Step 2: Trace income sources. Is your income derived from genuine returns generated by the project itself—or mainly from commissions earned by recruiting downstream participants?
Step 3: Analyze hierarchical structure. Does the project enforce clear upstream/downstream relationships—and distribute commissions based on hierarchy?
Step 4: Search the project’s corporate entity. Any legitimate blockchain project should feature a verifiable corporate entity, a traceable team background, and auditable, publicly available source code.
Lawyer Liu’s advice:
First, there’s no such thing as a free lunch. The classic combo of “passive yield + dynamic referral rewards” is the hallmark of pyramid schemes.
Second, “entering early is an advantage” is a fallacy. At its core, a pyramid scheme is a financial game of musical chairs—the later you join, the more likely you are to be left holding the bag.
Third, stop immediately upon suspicion. Don’t cling to the “let’s wait and see” mindset—because waiting until the final moment to withdraw usually means losing everything.
Fourth, proactively report suspicious activity to protect yourself. The earlier you report, the lower your potential losses—and the less likely you’ll bear joint liability in the pyramid scheme.
In the world of cryptocurrency, genuine projects speak through technology and products—not recruitment. Real investment relies on value discovery—not passing the hot potato. Any project demanding you recruit others and profit from headcount—no matter how glossy its Web3 packaging—is, at its core, operating under the same old pyramid logic. Recognizing this is the very first step toward protecting your wallet.
The Web3 Trojan Horse: How Pyramid Schemes Are Poisoning Crypto Adoption
The recent exposé on pyramid schemes disguised as Web3 projects reveals a troubling pattern that extends beyond mere fraud—it represents a fundamental threat to the credibility and long-term adoption of blockchain technology. For experienced crypto investors, understanding this phenomenon is crucial not only for protecting capital but also for navigating an increasingly sophisticated landscape of deception.
Market Impact: Erosion of Trust and Regulatory Backlash
The proliferation of crypto pyramid schemes creates significant headwinds for the entire industry. Each major scam not only victimizes participants but also reinforces negative narratives among regulators and the public, who already view crypto through a skeptical lens. This “Trojan horse” approach—where traditional fraud mechanisms are wrapped in blockchain terminology—undermines years of legitimate technological development and innovation.
Recent market data shows that following high-profile crypto scam revelations, we typically observe:
– Short-term negative sentiment affecting correlated sectors
– Increased regulatory scrutiny that often overreaches into legitimate projects
– Reduced institutional adoption during periods of heightened fraud exposure
The most dangerous aspect is that these schemes often operate at the intersection of genuine innovation and outright fraud, creating a “gray area” that damages projects with legitimate utility through guilt by association.
Identifying the Red Flags: Beyond the Surface
The article correctly identifies three core features of pyramid schemes, but experienced investors should recognize additional sophisticated red flags:
-
Tokenomics as Recruitment Tools: Legitimate projects design token economics around actual utility and value capture. Pyramid scheme tokens are primarily designed to reward recruitment with diminishing returns for later participants.
-
Fake Decentralization Claims: Truly decentralized projects have verifiable code, transparent teams, and community governance that doesn’t require recruitment for participation. Projects claiming decentralization while demanding recruitment are almost certainly fraudulent.
-
Complexity as a Shield: The deliberate use of confusing terminology isn’t accidental—it’s designed to create an illusion of sophistication that prevents critical questioning. Legitimate projects can explain their value proposition clearly.
Investment Opportunities in the Aftermath
While these schemes present clear dangers, they also create opportunities for savvy investors:
-
Due Diligence Services: The need for expert verification of projects has never been greater, creating demand for specialized analytical services that can cut through the noise.
-
Regulatory-Compliant Platforms: Exchanges and platforms implementing stricter listing standards will benefit from the flight to quality as investors seek safer environments.
-
Legitimate DeFi and Web3 Projects: Projects with real utility, transparent teams, and sustainable tokenomics will increasingly differentiate themselves and capture market share from fraudulent alternatives.
-
Security and Auditing Firms: As scams become more sophisticated, the demand for smart contract auditing and security verification will continue to grow.
Risk Mitigation Strategies
For experienced investors navigating this landscape:
-
Follow the Money, Not the Hype: Trace the economic flow. If returns primarily come from recruitment rather than value generation, it’s a pyramid scheme regardless of technical jargon.
-
Demand Verifiable Utility: Ask fundamental questions: What problem does this project solve? Who are the users? What is the revenue model beyond token appreciation?
-
Scrutinize Token Distribution: Legitimate projects typically have transparent token distribution with significant allocations to development, ecosystem growth, and user incentives. Pyramid schemes often concentrate tokens early with distribution tied to recruitment.
-
Consider Regulatory Risk: Projects operating in jurisdictions with clear regulatory frameworks carry less risk than those in regulatory gray areas or those actively evading oversight.
The Road Ahead: Balancing Innovation and Protection
The crypto industry must address these challenges proactively. The current situation resembles the early days of the internet, where fraudulent schemes proliferated before better safeguards emerged. Projects leading in transparency, utility, and user protection will ultimately prevail.
For investors, the key takeaway is that while the crypto market offers unprecedented opportunities, it also demands heightened scrutiny. The line between innovation and fraud has never been thinner, and the ability to distinguish between them will separate successful investors from victims in the coming years.
As the regulatory landscape evolves, we can expect increased enforcement against pyramid schemes, which will likely include both the platforms facilitating them and the promoters driving recruitment. This crackdown, while necessary, will create short-term volatility but ultimately strengthen the market by removing bad actors and building a foundation of trust.